이 녀석, 돈을 집었으면 했는데, 쌀을 집었다. 집에서 튀밥 집어먹는 것을 너무 좋아하더니 튀밥처럼 보였나 보다. 뭘 집던 어떠랴. 건강하게만 자라다오~

초대장에 날짜가 잘못되었네요. 2006년인데..

-----------------------------------------------------------

Memory leaks are reported when you use multiple MFC DLLs

Article ID : 167929
Last Review : June 6, 2005
Revision : 4.0
This article was previously published under Q167929

SYMPTOMS
When you debug a project that contains MFC regular (USRDLL) DLLs or ActiveX Controls (OCX), you may see memory leaks similar to the following reported in the debugger:   
a CDynLinkLibrary object at $00410F70, 64 bytes long
a CDynLinkLibrary object at $00410F70, 64 bytes long
{38} client block at 0x00410D80, subtype 0, 64 bytes long.
a CDynLinkLibrary object at $00410D80, 64 bytes long
a CDynLinkLibrary object at $00410D80, 64 bytes long
{36} client block at 0x00410C60, subtype 0, 64 bytes long.
a CDynLinkLibrary object at $00410C60, 64 bytes long
a CDynLinkLibrary object at $00410C60, 64 bytes long

CAUSE
These memory leaks are reported when multiple versions of the MFC DLL are loaded in the same process. Since MFC extension (AFXDLL) DLLs require the exact same MFC DLL as the call application, this problem can only occur when using MFC regular (USRDLL) DLLs or ActiveX Controls (OCX) that use the shared version of MFC.

The most common case is mixing ANSI (MFC4xd.DLL) and UNICODE (MFC4xxUd.DLL) versions of MFC in the same process. This can also occur when mixing MFC42d.DLL and MFC40d.DLL.

RESOLUTION
These memory leak notifications are false, and can be ignored. Since neither copy of MFC knows about the other ones, it's not easy to stop these false leaks from being reported. However, it is possible to separate the false leaks from the potential real leaks. This can be done by overriding CWinApp::ExitInstance() in both the EXE and DLL and placing TRACE() statements in them:   

   int CTestDllApp::ExitInstance()
{
TRACE(_T("ExitInstance() for regular DLL: TESTDLL "));
return CWinApp::ExitInstance();
}

Only the memory leaks that are detected after the last CWinApp::ExitInstance() is called are true memory leaks.

STATUS
This behavior is by design.

MORE INFORMATION
Consider the following application/DLLs:
-------------               --------------
=           =               =            =
=   MFC     =    Calls      =    MFC     =
=   APP     = ------------> =   USRDLL   =
=           =               =            =
=           =               =            =
-------------               --------------
      |                           |
      |                           |
      | Calls                     | Calls
      |                           |
      /                         /
-------------               --------------
=           =               =            =
=           =               =            =
=   MFC40d  =               =   MFC40Ud  =
=    DLL    =               =    DLL     =
=           =               =            =
-------------               --------------
                            /
                           /
             Calls       / Calls
                         /
              /         /
              -------------
              =           =
              =           =
              =  MSVCR40d =
              =   (CRT)   =
              =           =
              -------------

The MFC Application that is built with the ANSI (MFC40d.DLL) version of MFC calls the MFC USRDLL, which is built with the UNICODE (MFC40Ud.DLL) version of MFC. Both MFC versions use the same C run-time (CRT) DLL, MSVCR40d.DLL. Since MFC USRDLLs are "black-boxes", there should be no problems with calling a UNICODE MFC USRDLL from an ANSI MFC Application.

However, since the UNICODE (MFC40ud.DLL) and ANSI (MFC40d.DLL) MFC DLLs both use the same CRT DLL, false memory leaks are reported on all the objects allocated in the MFC USRDLL. This occurs because MFC relies on the CRT DLL to allocate and track all memory. It does not separate the memory allocations from the different versions of MFC. When one of the MFC DLLs unloads, it calls the CRT to do a memory dump, assuming everything left in the heap is a memory leak. However, this assumption is incorrect since there are two multiple copies of MFC in memory.

(c) Microsoft Corporation 1997, All Rights Reserved. Contributions by Kelly Marie Ward, Microsoft Corporation.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------